Wiki Government author Beth Noveck’s March 4 seminar at The Long Now Foundation can now be viewed at FORA.tv. A full transcript of her remarks is also available. Noveck, who serves as deputy chief technology officer for open government in the Office of Science and Technology Policy, was recently chosen as one of the “Federal 100” by Federal Computer Week. In her Long Now seminar, she discusses the history of the patent system, the genesis of Peer-to-Patent, the Obama administration’s Open Government initiative, and more broadly, the implications of new technology for thinking about democracy. She also responds to questions on such topics as transparency and secrecy in government.
- Watch the seminar.
- Learn more about Wiki Government.
- Read about the Open Government initiative.





President George W. Bush intended to bring democracy to the Middle East, but the early results were dispiriting. After stalemate in Iraq and the electoral success of Hamas, many observers concluded that the pursuit of Arab democracy was a fool's errand. Despite these setbacks,
The race for the White House may seem like a marathon, but the nomination process is becoming a sprint, with the starting gun fired earlier each time. Where state primaries and caucuses were once spread out over a period of three or four months, most are now crammed into a four—or five—week interval at the very beginning of the delegate selection calendar. Despite the importance of this issue in American politics, however, too little systematic analysis has been done on the topic.
Reforming the Primary Process: Author Elaine Kamarck shares perspective
“Democratic Change Commission” hosts Kamarck at public meeting
It’s an off year between presidential election seasons, so the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee have begun to discuss, once again, the many issues entangling the presidential primary elections. According to a Washington Post article on Sunday, June 28, Primary Politics: How Presidential Candidates Have Shaped the Modern Nominating System author Elaine Kamarck added her own opinion to the debate at a public meeting held by the “Democratic Change Commission.” Speaking before an audience of political elites, Kamarck suggested that superdelegates be eliminated from the primary process, a controversial stance that garnered a mixed response. From the article, Kamarck argued that “the selection of presidential nominees is now a public process and has eliminated the need for elites who could assert themselves in the equivalent of a back-room role.”
Kamarck’s Primary Politics, which explores how the presidential primary process became the complex, often confusing system that it is today, will be published this July.
- Read the Washington Post's "There They Go Again: Fixing the Primary Process"
- Learn more about Primary Politics
Posted by Brookings Press on July 01, 2009 in Commentary, Democracy, Elections, Government, Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)